Program - 2017

On the one hand, the technology of biometric identification has reached a level of development that is acceptable to industrial implementations. On the other is continuously growing and increasingly complex threats that require a response in the most modern solutions for their detection and elimination. The adoption and entry into force of the NPA requiring the use of biometrics. identification on certain objects.Speech – a story about the practical aspects of implementation of solutions for video identification. In laboratory and bench conditions, it is possible to observe the excellent results of many decisions. A very different picture emerges in practice. The project of creation and introduction of system of video identification, particularly when it comes to security, it is always a complex project. There are no "solutions out of the box". And in practice there are a large number of difficulties and unexpected problems, without which the project would not take off. The presentation primarily aimed at the owners and exploiters of the objects that are going (on his own initiative or in accordance with the published NPA) to introduce a system of videomaterial, and who are interested in real results, not in the project "for show".I will share real case studies and overcome difficulties. Tell why the system integrator needs to implement such projects. CROC is known in the market that takes on the most complex and non-trivial task, and always finds their solutions and bring projects to fruition – and this is important.

Biometrics of the iris of the eye is still one of the most exotic, but at the same time, very promising method of identifying a person. Today, the use of biometric algorithms in access control systems is no longer exclusively for the so-called "innovators" customers, who are generally inclined to introduce various technological novelties.Such projects are increasingly appearing in a variety of areas of management, and have more than once proven their effectiveness relative to traditional attributive (for example, RFID) means of identification.In addition to biometric technologies already familiar to a wide range of consumers (fingerprinting, geometry the palm of the hand, the two-dimensional face recognition), alternative methods are actively developing, including the biometrics of the iris (it is enough to recall its active promotion by some manufacturers of wearable devices), the main tasks of the report are: - acquaintance of a wide range of consumers with the basics of technology; debunking of established myths regarding the recognition of the iris of the eye - illumination of its merits and limitations; - illustration of the main theses with real examples of implementations. I invite to the speech the professionals of the security industry, users of the ACS and everyone interested in modern biometric developments

Voice biometrics is one of the most discussed technologies. This is not surprising: standardization of biometric authentication is in full swing, while the voice is the only modality for telephone service channel. Many companies have approached the use of this technology, but because of the lack of objective information, experience difficulty in forming and calculation case.My statement about what exactly is voice biometrics. What it measures, and what you can do with measurements. What is the actual reliability of the technology and can "steal voice.”Based on real experience, I will tell you that may find practical application, and that relates to the field of legends. What are the effective scenario, the use of technology within the capabilities of modern business. What are the risks of implementation and operation, and how to minimize them.

Multibiometry is a personality recognition technology based on biological and behavioral characteristics and incorporating the use of biometric association. In multibiometry, the union can be performed at the level of modalities (fingerprint, face, voice, etc.); at the level of algorithms; at the level of sensors (face in the visible and infrared range); at the instance level (several different implementations of one biometric characteristic). The unification technology is aimed at improving the technical and operational characteristics of the biometric system. At present, two biometric modalities are most often used in multibiometry. The main consumers of this technology appear in areas where an extremely high level of security is required, which can not be achieved with the help of one technology. For example, for the remote identification of a user in the provision of banking services to him, only a person's biometric characteristics may not be enough, although this technology can provide false tolerance errors at 10-3-10-4. In addition, it is assumed that the forgery of one technology is much simpler than the forgery of two biometric characteristics simultaneously. When creating multibiometric systems, the main issue remains the reliability and justification of a combination of biometric modalities. At present, large-scale tests of multibiometric algorithms and systems have not been carried out, which confirm a significant increase in reliability. And also there are no recommendations on the choice of biometric modalities and the method of their combination. The report will consider the following issues of multibiometric technology: • How to choose a combination of biometric characteristics for a multibiometric system? • What are the ways to combine modalities and what are their advantages and disadvantages? • How to evaluate the reliability of a multibiometric system? Currently, there are many developers of single-model biometric systems on the Russian and foreign markets using fingerprints, face, voice. The creation of multibiometric systems requires from the developers of co-operation and a sufficiently serious investment, so for them the advantages of this direction must be calculated: will the performance characteristics improve, which modalities and approaches should be better used for this. The report will be based on the analysis of the results of independent testing, standards and technical reports in the field of multimodal systems, as well as on data of domestic and foreign articles in the field of multibiometry.